Minggu, 13 November 2011

[J180.Ebook] Free Ebook The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes

Free Ebook The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes

The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes As a matter of fact, publication is really a window to the globe. Even many individuals may not appreciate reviewing books; guides will certainly consistently give the precise details concerning reality, fiction, experience, experience, politic, faith, and more. We are below a site that provides compilations of books more than the book establishment. Why? We provide you great deals of numbers of link to get the book The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes On is as you require this The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes You can find this book easily right here.

The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes

The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes



The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes

Free Ebook The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes

Just how if your day is begun by checking out a book The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes But, it remains in your gizmo? Everybody will always touch as well as us their device when getting up as well as in morning tasks. This is why, we intend you to additionally check out a book The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes If you still confused the best ways to obtain the book for your gadget, you can follow the way right here. As here, our company offer The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes in this internet site.

When some people checking out you while reading The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes, you could really feel so proud. But, instead of other people feels you must instil in on your own that you are reading The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes not due to that reasons. Reading this The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes will certainly offer you greater than people appreciate. It will overview of understand more than the people staring at you. Even now, there are numerous resources to learning, checking out a book The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes still comes to be the first choice as an excellent method.

Why must be reading The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes Again, it will depend upon exactly how you feel and also consider it. It is surely that one of the perk to take when reading this The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes; you could take much more lessons straight. Also you have actually not undertaken it in your life; you can gain the experience by reading The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes As well as currently, we will present you with the on-line book The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes in this website.

What sort of publication The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes you will like to? Currently, you will certainly not take the printed publication. It is your time to obtain soft documents book The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes instead the published papers. You can enjoy this soft data The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes in at any time you expect. Even it is in anticipated place as the various other do, you could check out guide The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes in your device. Or if you really want more, you could continue reading your computer or laptop to get complete display leading. Juts find it right here by downloading the soft data The Origin Of Consciousness In The Breakdown Of The Bicameral Mind, By Julian Jaynes in link web page.

The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes

At the heart of this classic, seminal book is Julian Jaynes's still-controversial thesis that human consciousness did not begin far back in animal evolution but instead is a learned process that came about only three thousand years ago and is still developing. The implications of this revolutionary scientific paradigm extend into virtually every aspect of our psychology, our history and culture, our religion -- and indeed our future.

  • Sales Rank: #44528 in Books
  • Color: White
  • Brand: Jaynes, Julian
  • Published on: 2000-08-15
  • Released on: 2000-08-15
  • Original language: English
  • Number of items: 1
  • Dimensions: 9.00" h x 1.25" w x 6.00" l, 1.38 pounds
  • Binding: Paperback
  • 512 pages

From The New Yorker
"When Julian Jaynes . . . speculates that until late in the twentieth millennium b.c. men had no consciousness but were automatically obeying the voices of the gods, we are astounded but compelled to follow this remarkable thesis."

Review
"When Julian Jaynes . . . speculates that until late in the twentieth millennium b.c. men had no consciousness but were automatically obeying the voices of the gods, we are astounded but compelled to follow this remarkable thesis." -- John Updike The New Yorker

About the Author
Julian Jaynes (1923-1997) achieved an almost cult-like reputation for this controversial book, which was his only published work.

Most helpful customer reviews

550 of 573 people found the following review helpful.
Intriguing
By Evelyn Uyemura
First of all the book was copyrighted in 1976 and apparently first published in 1982. That is eons ago in the science of cognition and brain imaging. So I would like to know how the past 2 and a half decades have affected the theories in this book.
I also note that the author taught at Princeton University (he died in 1997), so his theories ought to have received a hearing. But apparently the follow-up book he intended was never published, and he was considered somewhat of a maverick, if not quite a crackpot. This website offers some perspective: [...]
His theory, in simplest terms, is that until about 3000 years ago, all of humankind basically heard voices. The voices were actually coming from the other side of the brain, but because the two hemispheres were not in communication the way they are now for most of us, the voices seemed to be coming from outside. The seemed, in fact, to be coming from God or the gods.
So far, so good. That is certainly imaginable to most of us, because we know that schizophrenics and some others still hear voices in apparently this manner today.
But he also posits that many sophisticated civilizations were created by men and women who were all directed by these godlike voices. What is not very clearly explained (a serious gap in his theory) is how all the voices in these "bicameral civilizations," as he calls them, worked in harmony. But his theory is that ancient Greece, Babylon, Assyria, Egpyt, and less ancient but similar Mayan and Incan kingdoms were all built by people who were not "conscious" in our modern sense.
When one hears voices, whether then or now, the voices tend to be commanding and directive, and the need to obey them compelling. Free will is not possible. And so the people who built the pyramids were not self-aware as we are, did not feel self-pity, did not make plans, but simply obeyed the voices, which somehow were in agreement that the thing must be done.
Again, when he mentions that hypnosis may be triggering a reversion to a similar kind of consciousness, in which a voice, somehow channeled through the sub-conscious rather than the reasoning part of the brain, has an unusual compelling quality to it, and enables a person to do things that in their conscious analytic mind they are unable to do, we feel that we do have a glimmer that such a state of being is possible.
Of course, he connects these ideas to schizophrenia, seeing that as a throw-back to an earlier kind of mind-state, though now socially unacceptable and also unacceptable to its victim, who retains a remembrance of what it was to have control of his or her own mind.
He also sees prophets as remnants of the older mind, still able to hear the voices after most people had lost the ability. And he sees idol worship and modern religious behavior as both signs of a longing for the lost certainty and simplicity of a world in which decisions didn't have to be made, and all were of one accord as to what the gods wanted done.
I don't see much evidence for the pastoral simplicity which he thinks the bicameral mind lived in. But I do think that it is possible that not only ancient people but even many modern people have mind-experiences that are very different from our individualistic, introspective, self-determined ideas. In fact, I think relatively few human beings question and ponder and change belief systems as we might. The feeling of being adrift in a world that we can't understand, struggling with questions about everything, is far from universal, I think.
It is pertinent that he calls the shift from bicameral (two houses) to modern consciousness a "breakdown." He sees the shift as happening in response to crises and threats in the environment, but he doesn't present it as necessarily positive, and certainly not as pleasant to those living in its shadow. He sees the cries of the Jews and many other people for God to "rend the heavens and come down," to "not forsake them," as cried from people who no longer hear the "voices" that seemed to be the gods, and who desperately miss them.
In view of individuals such as Mother Teresa, who at one point had a clear inner sense of being directed by God (not necessarily actual auditory voices) and then lost that sense of presence and had to walk blindly thereafter (or silently would be a better metaphor), perhaps we would agree that the experience of the gods or God going silent not only happened at large in human history but is often recapitulated in individuals' personal history as well.
If Jaynes is on to something (and I think he is, though I think he may have pushed his "theory of everything" too far and lost scientific credibility), his theory does help us understand why there is a widespread belief that in Biblical times, God interacted with people in a very different way than He does now. The Bible, and other holy books as well, are remnants of a time when human beings own inner sense of right and wrong, clean and unclean, enemy and neighbor, were experienced as coming from outside of them, from disembodied voices that commanded great power. As the mind (or brain) developed, this split healed (or this mind broke down?) and this knowing become a still small voice in many people, and in others a resounding silence.
The question remains: should we take the reductionist view, and look at all religious ideas as merely misunderstandings based on schizophrenic-like delusions and hallucinations? Or should we take the view that God, who in times past spoke to us in fire and plague and audible voices (and later in dreams and visions) has now become one with humanity and speaks to us in the silence of our own hearts?
A fascinating book, raising as many questions as it answers, but well worth the reading.

237 of 249 people found the following review helpful.
Fascinating thesis
By James Frohnhofer
Why is it that the characters in the Epic of Gilgamesh, the Iliad and the oldest books of the Bible behave in a manner that seems utterly alien to modern readers, but by the time of the New Testament and the classic Greek dramatists charcters seem to have the same feelings and motivations of modern man? Jaynes addresses this question, among others, in one of the most thought provoking books I've read.
Basically, he posits that lacking full consciousness (yet having language), prehistoric man's actions were often governed by voices, which are in many ways similar to certain forms of schizophrenia. His full argument is much deeper and far more subtle than I can deliver in a one-line synopsis.
The book is not a drum-beating New Age manual for making peace with our proto-selves, although many readers seem to have taken just that away from his discussion on the origins of religion.
The thesis is, of course, utterly unproveable, and both orthodox classicists and anthropologists are at odds with it. But it is remarkable in its originality. One needn't be convinced by the book to enjoy it; read it purely for Jayne's breadth of knowledge and his originality of thought and it will be well worth your time.

144 of 151 people found the following review helpful.
A paradigm-buster par excellence
By Timothy Dougal
It's hard to describe exactly what this book did to me. Suffice it to say that my views on history, religion, language and consciousness seem to be permanently altered, and my reading and thinking have broadened as a result. Jaynes defines conscousness too narrowly for some philosophers and psychologists, who seem to want it to include all of perception, but for me, his focus on interior dialogue, conceptual space, the notion of self, the ability to narratize and project this self into theoretical situations, is right on target. These are the kinds of things that create our notions of ourselves as human. Considerable space is devoted to anatomy, and split-brain studies, but the bulk of the book relies on archaeology, ancient art, ancient texts, and their use of language. This is the thrust of Jaynes' argument: consciousness arose only relatively late in human development, appearing first in the Middle East at the end of the second millenium BCE., and this consciousness was dependent on language. He theorizes that the right hemisphere of the brain was specialized to recall longterm information, as the left was (and still is, in most people) specialized for language. Pre-conscious people, he contends, hallucinated instructions of a super-ego-like nature generated in the right brain. In the simplest, small scale, early societies, these hallucinations were attributed to ancestors, chiefs, or kings. Eventually they were attributed to gods. As societies became increasingly complex, personal hallucination as a guiding force in life declined in value, and modern consciousness was born. To make his case, Gilgamesh, the Iliad, the Odyssey, Hesiod, and the Bible are examined, ancient carvings and burial practices are considered, and the evolution of religious practices involving idols, sacrifices, prophecy, omens and divination are all looked at. They give support to Jaynes' contentions and open the mind of the reader. This is a book that keeps on giving.

See all 277 customer reviews...

The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes PDF
The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes EPub
The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes Doc
The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes iBooks
The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes rtf
The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes Mobipocket
The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes Kindle

The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes PDF

The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes PDF

The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes PDF
The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind, by Julian Jaynes PDF

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar